According to Peter Martin* top economists say the Australian economy will be weak and in need of support after pandemic.
Australia’s economy will limp along after recovering from the pandemic, failing to regain the growth it had either in the years leading up to the crisis or the much higher growth in the decades before.
That’s the consensus of the 23 leading Australian economists assembled to take part in The Conversation’s July 1 forecasting survey — a panel that includes former Treasury, Reserve Bank and International Monetary Fund officials and modellers and policy specialists from 13 Australian universities.
On balance, the panel expects year-average economic growth (the measure reported in the budget) to slide from 4 per cent this financial year to just 2.2 per cent by 2024-25, well below the average of 2.6 per cent assumed in this week’s intergenerational report.
The panel forecasts much weaker business investment than does the budget and lower household spending, but higher wage growth and lower unemployment.
It expects a flat share market, and slower growth in house prices.
Weaker economic growth
During the decade leading up to the COVID-19 crisis, economic growth averaged 2.6 per cent per year.
During the 27 years between the early 1990s recession and the crisis, it averaged 3.2 per cent.
The panel’s average forecast of 2.2 per cent by the end of the four-year budget forecasting horizon is lower than both the budget forecast of 2.5 per cent and the 2.6 per cent in the intergenerational report.
Australia’s economy will limp along after recovering from the pandemic, failing to regain the growth it had either in the years leading up to the crisis or the much higher growth in the decades before.
That’s the consensus of the 23 leading Australian economists assembled to take part in The Conversation’s July 1 forecasting survey — a panel that includes former Treasury, Reserve Bank and International Monetary Fund officials and modellers and policy specialists from 13 Australian universities.
On balance, the panel expects year-average economic growth (the measure reported in the budget) to slide from 4 per cent this financial year to just 2.2 per cent by 2024-25, well below the average of 2.6 per cent assumed in this week’s intergenerational report.
The panel forecasts much weaker business investment than does the budget and lower household spending, but higher wage growth and lower unemployment.
It expects a flat share market, and slower growth in house prices.
Weaker economic growth
During the decade leading up to the COVID-19 crisis, economic growth averaged 2.6 per cent per year.
During the 27 years between the early 1990s recession and the crisis, it averaged 3.2 per cent.
The panel’s average forecast of 2.2 per cent by the end of the four-year budget forecasting horizon is lower than both the budget forecast of 2.5 per cent and the 2.6 per cent in the intergenerational report.
Economic modeller Janine Dixon expects growth of just 1.7 per cent.
She says after Australia has soaked up unemployment, its future economic growth can only be driven by population growth or improved productivity.
With population growth expected to be weak for several years, GDP growth will be weak unless dwindling productivity growth rebounds.
Forecasting veteran Saul Eslake says on the other hand, for as long as borders remain closed Australia should enjoy an “artificial boost” to domestic spending of more than A$50 billion per year from Australians who can’t spend abroad.
The two most optimistic forecasts of 3 per cent growth, from Angela Jackson and Sarah Hunter, are contingent on borders reopening and tourism and immigration restarting.
The panel expect extraordinarily strong growth in the United States of 5.2 per cent throughout 2021 on the back of what panelist Warren Hogan calls massive Government stimulus and a full-vaccination rate approaching 50 per cent.
China’s growth is forecast to rebound to 7.9 per cent, but will come under pressure from what panelist Mark Crosby describes as an attempt by some of China’s customers to diversify the sources of supply away from China.
Support from iron ore
The panel expects actual living standards to be higher than the bald economic growth figures suggest.
This is because high iron ore prices boost Australians’ buying power (by boosting the Australian dollar) and boost company profits in a way that isn’t fully reflected in gross domestic product.
In recent months, the spot iron ore price has been at a record US$200 a tonne, a high the budget assumes will collapse to near US$63 by April next year as supply held up in Brazil comes back online.
The panel is expecting the iron ore price to stay high for longer than the Treasury — for at least 18 months, ending this year near a still-high US$158 a tonne.
There’s agreement that at some point the unusually high price will fall, with one panelist saying there might be “one more year to ride this wave, then who knows”.
Because the panel expects a higher iron ore price than the Government in the year ahead, it expects a greater rise in nominal gross domestic product — the measure of cash pouring into wallets.
The panel forecasts an increase of 5 per cent this financial year compared to the budget forecast of 3.5 per cent.
But it expects consumer caution to limit growth in household spending to 4.2 per cent, much less than the budget forecast of 5.5 per cent.
Unemployment to fall quickly
The panel expects unemployment to fall more quickly than the Government does, to 4.7 per cent by mid-2022, a low the budget didn’t foresee until mid-2023.
The unemployment rate is already 5.1 per cent, something the May budget didn’t expect for a year.
However, it is to some extent artificially assisted because jobs that used to go to temporary foreign workers and were not counted in the employment statistics are now being taken by domestic workers who are counted.
As foreign workers return to Australia, the process will unwind, putting upward pressure on the recorded unemployment rate.
Wage growth better than budget
The May budget forecast wage growth of just 1.5 per cent in 2021-22 (less than forecast price growth), followed by only 2.25 per cent in 2022-23 (merely matching price growth), in part because of legislated increases in employers’ super contributions.
The forecasting panel is more optimistic for the year ahead, being able to take account of the Fair Work Commission’s 2.5 per cent increase in award wages announced in June.
Warren Hogan calls 2.5 per cent the new “baseline”, with some labour shortages forcing some employers to offer more.
Even so, the panel’s average wage growth forecast for 2021-22 is 2.2 per cent, only marginally above expected price inflation of 2.1 per cent.
Slower home price growth
The panel expects weaker home price growth in the year ahead, with the CoreLogic Sydney price index climbing 6.4 per cent after a year in which it soared 11.2 per cent.
Melbourne prices should climb a further 5.2 per cent after a year in which they gained 5 per cent.
The panelists say much will depend on how long mortgage rates remain at their record lows, what action authorities take to restrain lending and when immigration restarts.
Low rates for some time
Over the past year, the bond rate at which the Commonwealth Government can borrow for ten years has jumped from 0.9 per cent to 1.5 per cent in accordance with moves overseas.
The panel expects further increases to a still-low 1.8 per cent by the end of this year and to 2.2 per cent by the end of next year.
Even so, the panel expects no increase in the Reserve Bank’s cash rate — the one that drives variable mortgage rates — for almost two years, until April 2023.
Former Reserve Bank head of research Peter Tulip, now with the Centre of Independent Studies, says the bank meant it when it said it said it wouldn’t lift the record-low cash rate of 0.1 per cent until actual inflation was “sustainably within” its 2-3 per cent target range, something that wasn’t likely until 2024.
Other panelists, including economic modeller Warwick McKibbin, believe those criteria might be met sooner, some as soon as mid-2022.
No take-off in investment
The panel doesn’t buy the Government’s bold prediction of a jump in non-mining business investment in response to budget tax measures.
The budget predicts year-on-year growth of 12.5 per cent in 2022-23 after 1.5 per cent in 2021-22.
Instead, the panel predicts 3.7 per cent in 2021-22 and 5.8 per cent in 2022-23, citing low population growth and the likelihood that most investment that could have been brought forward by tax measures has already been brought forward.
Former IMF official Tony Makin also points to the relatively high tax rates facing foreign investors and the increasingly restrictive approach of the Foreign Investment Review Board.
Other panelists cite lack of clarity about the rules governing investment in renewable energy and growing shortages of labour and materials as reasons to expect only restrained growth in business investment.
Markets steady
On balance, the panel expects the US-Australia exchange rate to stay where it is at around 76 US cents as it has for years, noting that much will depend on the iron ore price and the strength of the US economy.
On average, it expects no change in the Australian share market after 12 months in which the ASX200 has soared 24 per cent.
The average hides sharp differences. Some panelists expect the ASX200 to climb a further 10 per cent, while others expect it to fall 10 per cent.
One panelist, economic modeller Stephen Anthony, expects a collapse of 55 per cent, saying it “smells like a blood bath is coming”.
Deficits forevermore
This year’s budget forecast is for a deficit of 5 per cent of GDP after last year’s near-record 7.8 per cent of GDP.
Asked at what point over the next four decades the budget deficit would shrink to 1 per cent of GDP, three panelists replied “never”.
Six others said not before 2030. Only four nominated the decade ahead.
Angela Jackson said any improvements in the budget position delivered by a better-than-expected iron ore price would be spent.
Saul Eslake saw no appetite for either the tax increases or spending cuts that would be needed to eliminate the deficit, adding that, fortunately, there was no “urgent requirement to do so”.
Unexpected times
Forecasts often don’t come to pass.
This time last year, mid-pandemic in a rapidly evolving situation, the panel forecast unemployment of 8.8 per cent, no share market growth and ultra-low wage growth of just 0.9 per cent.
That these things didn’t happen was in part due to the role of such forecasts in persuading the Government to respond in an unprecedented fashion, a point made by Treasurer Josh Frydenberg launching the intergenerational report on Monday.
This year’s forecasts, prepared in a less-hectic environment, might have more staying power.
They point to a weak recovery and an economy reliant on Government support for some time to come.
*Peter Martin is a Visiting Fellow, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University
This article first appeared at theconversation.com.
